CO129-419 - Individuals - 1914 — Page 284

ہیں ل

he is strictly entitled to it in the Colony to which he is transferred. Me Irving's contention would be grossly unfair to H. Rong; he had served 10 only had 10 months Jars in FM 8.

leave;

❤

is he to be able to claim from

indefinite period, the $16

months further leave which

H. Hone, for

an

have taken from

M.S.?

I should say

he might

that question will be

in writing to for. as proposed say

referred to for: but, grant of leave to

sulget to the exigencies of the service, a

that floccoss the S. of

that he is now entitled

any

5. cannot admit

of night to

leave in respect of his previous service

Here

Ridley an as A. lasting cm

Col. Sic Way miliono

1. crenat

P

A

An

4.1.1-

that¬

Collins

5/1/14

Gen. Dept.

280

Have you any obsons on this ? My own

view is that previous service in another Colony

would ordinarily only be taken into conson in the

first grant of long leave after transfer, and

that when so taken into conson the amount of leave

given in respect of service in another Colony

should be definitely debited against such ser-

vice and not against service in the new Colony.

No further leave from the new Colony in res-

pect of service in a previous Colony would be al-'

lowed unless in very exceptional circumstances

(8.g. prolonged ill health, as in the recent case

Gen.

of Mr. Bertram, Att. of Ceylon).

Are

mr

Collins.

1. W

for

V mamajhimi

Ar

Ara

;י,ן

JM

See the minuter N2 22139

St Lucia

-02

Lave on account of precious secure in another

Coloz is not a

may be grauter

mather of right but such leave

Bd

a concession, when the

exigencies of the service permit.

Each case to be listed on it's merits att

the

seems to be the right way of dealing with such cases. Hand & fact rules won't woch. TCM. 6/1/15.